Love of the Game Auctions Love of the Game Auctions
• Spring, 2024 Premier Auction

Start: 3/11/2024 12:00 AM EST
End: 3/30/2024 9:00 PM EST

Prices Shown Include Buyer's Premium.

Search

Browse
Categories
  • All Categories
  • Featured Items (89)
  • Baseball Memorabilia (258)
    • 19th Century Memorabilia (50)
    • Prewar (1900-1948) Memorabilia (163)
    • Postwar (1949-present) Memorabilia (46)
    • Game-Used Memorabilia (31)
      • Bats (1)
      • Other (30)
    • Baseball Tickets (20)
    • Baseball Photographs (121)
  • Baseball Cards (1108)
    • Baseball Postcards (23)
    • 19th Century (139)
    • 1900-1948 (492)
    • 1949-Present (487)
  • Football Cards (25)
    • 1895-1948 (1)
    • 1949-Present (24)
  • Basketball Cards (24)
  • Hockey Cards (1)
  • Boxing Cards (19)
    • Prewar Boxing Cards (19)
  • Miscellaneous Sports Cards (4)
  • Non-Sports Cards (14)
  • Football Memorabilia (12)
  • Basketball Memorabilia (6)
  • Boxing Memorabilia (5)
    • Prewar Boxing Memorabilia (3)
    • Postwar Boxing Memorabilia (2)
  • Miscellaneous Sports Memorabilia (5)
  • Autographs (197)
    • Baseball (169)
      • Autographed Baseballs (2)
      • Autographed Cards (157)
      • Autographed Flats/Cuts/GPCs (20)
      • Autographed Photos (1)
      • Other Autographed Items (1)
    • Football (18)
  • Pop Culture and Americana (5)
  Prev Next  

Lot # 28: 1952 Topps #347 Joe Adcock - SGC NM+ 7.5

Category: Delete

Starting Bid: $100.00

Bids: 18 (Bid History)

Time Left: Auction closed

Add To Watchlist

Lot / Auction Closed




This lot is closed. Bidding is not allowed.

Item was in Auction "Summer, 2020 Auction",
which ran from 11/13/2020 7:13 AM to
8/30/2020 7:23 AM


Lot Description  

Brilliant example well-centered but slightly off from top-to-bottom. Corners are sharp as are the edges the image itself bright and free of print defects. It should be noted that this card like the other SGC cards from this 1952 Topps collection was initially rejected by PSA for evidence of trimming an assessment with which SGC disagrees.

Views: 7